Skip to content

Future Members
- - - Council Specific Information
  - - Finance & Facility Information
    - Interested in Joining
Current Members
Parents & Families
Advisors
Alumni
- Alumni Circle of Legends Nomination Form
- CSU Fraternity & Sorority Alumni Circle of Legends

Home
About
- - - Fraternity and Sorority Information
  - - About the Councils
Programs
- Auxiliary Groups
- Events and Classes
Resources

Home
About
- Fraternity and Sorority Information
- About the Councils
Programs
- Auxiliary Groups
- Events and Classes
Resources

Future Members
Current Members
Parents & Families
Advisors
Alumni
- Alumni Circle of Legends Nomination Form
- CSU Fraternity & Sorority Alumni Circle of Legends

Search

Home » Individual Awards Rubrics

Individual Awards Rubrics

"*" indicates required fields

Reader's Name*

First Last

Nominee's Name*

First Last

Select the council that the nominee is a member*

Each nomination is hosted in a Google folder that denotes which council the nominee is a member.

Select the award category being evaluated.*

To view the full description of each award, please click here

Award Specific Questions

Questions will populate once the award category is selected.

Chapter Advisor of the Year

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominated advisor demonstrates and upholds the principles/values of the organization they advise.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominated advisor challenges and supports the chapter and individual members to uphold organizational values and meet organizational expectations.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why the nominated advisor should be recognized as ‘Chapter Advisor of the Year’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s leadership, character, and commitment to assisting the organization they advise in reaching their unique potential.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Chapter President of the Year

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominated president upholds the principles/values of their organization.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominated president challenges and supports members of their organization to uphold the principles, values, and expectations of their organization.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of the impact that the nominated president has had on their chapter, including how the nominee has created a legacy that positively impacts their chapter, council, and beyond.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why the nominee should be recognized as ‘Chapter President of the Year’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s leadership, character, and commitment to bettering their organization.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Fraternity/ Sorority Emerging Leader

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominated emerging leader upholds the principles/values of their organization.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of the impact that the nominated emerging leader has had on their chapter. This should include how the nominee will continue to positively impact their chapter, council, and beyond in the future.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why the nominee should be recognized as ‘Fraternity/Sorority Emerging Leader of the Year’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s leadership, character, and commitment to bettering their organization.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Fraternity/Sorority Member of the Year

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominated member upholds the principles/values of their organization and the values of the fraternity and sorority community, as expressed in the CLIMB.

4

3

2

1

0

Please view the non-negotiable values expressed in CLIMB here. • 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominated member has demonstrated their commitment to improve the CSU fraternity and sorority community.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why the nominee should be recognized as the ‘Fraternity/Sorority Member of the Year’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples that demonstrate the nominee’s contribution to their organization, the fraternity and sorority community, and the larger CSU community.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Living the Ritual

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominee consistently and positively displays organizational and community values through their daily actions and behaviors.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominee inspires and motivates others around them to be more values-driven.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why this nominee should receive the ‘Living the Ritual Award’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s commitment to living by their organizational Ritual.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Outstanding Campus Involvement

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of the nominee’s campus involvements and the leadership positions they have held in and outside of their chapter.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominee positively represents the fraternity and sorority community through their involvements.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why this nominee should receive the ‘Outstanding Campus Involvement Award’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s commitment to serving the institution through activities, organizations, and opportunities.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Outstanding Community Service & Philanthropy

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominee actively contributes to community service and philanthropy through their individual efforts and/or through creating opportunities for others to engage in service and philanthropy.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominee displays their personal value of giving back and represent the fraternity and sorority foundational value of service.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why this nominee should receive the ‘Outstanding Community Service & Philanthropy Award’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s commitment to service and philanthropy.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Outstanding Diversity, Social Justice, & Inclusion

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominee actively promotes and advocates for diversity, social justice, and inclusion.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how this nominee demonstrates a commitment to change in the fraternal movement through their values of equity and social justice.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why this nominee should receive the ‘Outstanding Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion Award’ at the awards ceremony. Please include specific examples of the nominee’s commitment to social justice and inclusion.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Outstanding Scholar

Please review each individual’s application(s) and letter(s) of support (not required) and score them based on the criteria below. Please note, the scoring rubric prior to scoring (4- Extensively Articulated, 3-Articulated, 2- Moderately Articulated, 1-Slightly Articulated, 0- Not Articulated).

Articulation of how the nominated outstanding scholar demonstrates their commitment to lifelong learning and critical thinking.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of how the nominee prioritizes their academic pursuits and/or support others in their academic pursuits.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Articulation of why this nominee should receive the ‘Outstanding Scholar Award’ at the FSL Awards Ceremony. This should include specific examples of the nominee’s commitment to scholarship beyond a high grade point average and how they engage with their academic major.

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extensively Articulated • 3-Articulated • 2- Moderately Articulated • 1-Slightly Articulated • 0- Not Articulated

Overall Nomination Information

Overall Strength of Nomination

4

3

2

1

0

• 4- Extremely Strong • 3-Strong • 2- Moderately Strong • 1-Slightly Strong • 0- Not Strong

Based off of the submitted materials for the nominee, please select your level of recommendation below:

Recommend for Award without Reservations

Recommend for Award with Reservations

Do not Recommend for Award

Join Our Community

Instagram Youtube Tiktok

Current Members

Elevation Accreditation
Philanthropy Event Registration
Social Event Registration
Philanthropy Post-Event Form
Chapter Spotlight

Future Members

Join a Fraternity or Sorority
Fraternity & Sorority Life Guide
Frequently Asked Questions
Request Information
Welcome Back Block Party

Parents & Families

About Fraternities & Sororities
Finance & Facility Information
Frequently Asked Questions
Community Accountability

Contact Our Office

fsl_frontdesk@mail.colostate.edu

Lory Student Center
Room 142

Contact CSU | Equal Opportunity | Privacy Statement | Accessibility Statement | Disclaimer | CARES Act